**New Study Reveals Chilling Effects of Radical Internet Addiction Cure**

BREAKING: A groundbreaking yet disturbing study has emerged, revealing the chilling consequences of a radical treatment for internet addiction, known as HIRSIA. The research, conducted by Dr. William Cantwell, has garnered attention after its alarming findings were published in the December 2025 issue of Lightspeed Magazine, featuring a fictional narrative by Nancy Kress.

New reports confirm that two million teenagers in the United States, including Oliver Eagleton, are suffering from this debilitating condition, which has escalated into a national crisis. The FDA has recently approved human trials for a controversial treatment involving deep brain stimulation, aimed at treating adolescents who refuse to leave their rooms due to excessive internet use.

This radical approach, however, has raised urgent ethical concerns. While the treatment promises to reduce addiction levels by altering brain chemistry, many experts are warning of unintended consequences. Reports indicate that subjects of the study are exhibiting significant changes in personality and emotional responses, leading to a stark decrease in creativity and empathy.

Oliver Eagleton’s case has drawn particular scrutiny from parents and medical professionals alike. Once a bright, imaginative boy, Oliver has reportedly become increasingly detached and pragmatic post-treatment. His mother, Sarah Eagleton, expressed her deep concerns after noticing alarming shifts in her son’s behavior. “He seems different,” she stated. “His voice is flatter, and the creativity I once admired in him has vanished.”

“Our research shows that while these treatments may curb internet addiction, they could also suppress emotional depth and imagination,” explained Dr. Jerome Makin, a psychiatrist involved in the trials.

As the controversy unfolds, the implications of the study are becoming increasingly alarming. Critics are demanding a reevaluation of the treatment’s long-term effects on children’s mental health. “The societal impact of altering a child’s brain to fit a norm is profound,” noted Dr. Makin. “We need to consider the psychological cost of such interventions.”

The study has ignited fierce debate among parents, educators, and mental health professionals. Many argue that while the treatment might help some kids, it could irreparably harm others by stifling their natural creativity. Reports have emerged of former video game enthusiasts now struggling to engage with any form of imaginative play or storytelling.

As the Eagleton family grapples with the fallout from Oliver’s treatment, they are not alone. Nationwide, families are facing similar dilemmas as they navigate the complexities of internet addiction and the drastic measures suggested by medical professionals.

Looking ahead, the medical community is expected to hold urgent discussions on the ethical implications of such therapies. The next steps for families like the Eagletons remain uncertain as they confront a future where their child’s emotional landscape may have been irrevocably altered.

This developing story continues to unfold as more families share their experiences and researchers work to understand the full impact of these radical treatments. Stay tuned for further updates on this critical issue affecting youth across the nation.