Shark Glam Styler Challenges Dyson Airwrap with Impressive Features

The launch of the Shark Glam hair styler is making waves in the beauty industry, positioning itself as a formidable competitor to the Dyson Airwrap. Priced at **$449** in the United States and **£369** in the United Kingdom, the Glam is designed to provide a versatile styling experience that could lead users to reconsider their loyalty to the Airwrap.

Shark Glam: Specifications and Features

The Shark Glam measures **1.69 in L x 1.61 in W x 9.79 in H** and weighs **1.6 lbs**. It boasts three airflow settings and three temperature settings, along with a cold shot feature, all powered by an **8-foot cord**. Each purchase includes essential attachments: the **Glossi Round Brush** and the **Silki Hot Tool + Air Straightener**. Users can also select two additional attachments from a range that includes various curlers, brushes, and a diffuser.

Shark has been striving to surpass Dyson in the hair styling market for several years. After a month of testing the Glam, it has become apparent that this new device may indeed offer a superior experience. With fine, curly hair that often proves challenging to manage, the Glam has simplified the processes of diffusing, straightening, and curling, significantly reducing styling time.

Performance Review of the Shark Glam

The Shark Glam was tested in the United Kingdom using the “Drying System with Diffuser,” which comes with a selection of attachments. The included concentrator is particularly useful, transforming the device into a basic hair dryer, something that Shark should consider including with all units given its utility.

Feedback on the diffuser has been overwhelmingly positive. Shark’s initial diffuser model was well-received, and the new version allows users to adjust the length of the prongs, accommodating different hair types and volumes. The Glam offers three speed settings and temperature levels, making it adaptable for various styling routines.

After just ten minutes of mid-heat drying, the results were impressive. The versatility of the settings means that users can tailor their approach to suit their hair type. For those who prefer a quicker method, the device can efficiently dry hair without compromising on style.

The **Glossi attachment** has also drawn praise for its performance. With both wet and dry modes, it can deliver a smooth finish while shaping the hair effectively. After using the concentrator to dry, the Glossi made quick work of styling, achieving a voluminous look in about twenty minutes.

While the Shark Glam’s noise level reaches **84dB**, which is louder than the Dyson Airwrap, it does not detract significantly from its performance.

The **Auto-Wrap Curlers** included with the Glam provide a comparable experience to those of the Airwrap, effectively curling hair with minimal effort. However, the lack of a directional airflow option on the curlers may be a drawback for some users.

Comparative Analysis: Shark Glam vs. Dyson Airwrap

When comparing the Shark Glam to the Dyson Airwrap, several pros and cons emerge. The Dyson model is quieter, with a noise level of **74dB**, and features more attachments, albeit with some limitations in styling capabilities. In contrast, the Shark Glam allows for more customization through its attachment selection and comes with a convenient travel case.

Despite its high price point, the Shark Glam appears to justify its cost by combining multiple functionalities into one device, effectively replacing several other styling tools. This versatility makes it a compelling choice for consumers seeking an all-in-one solution.

In conclusion, the Shark Glam’s performance and features suggest it may be a worthy investment for those serious about their hair styling needs. While its price is significant, the potential savings from replacing multiple styling tools could make it an appealing option. If available at a discount, the Shark Glam could be an excellent addition to any beauty toolkit.