Trump’s Prosecutor Faces ‘Fatal’ Threat After Major Legal Blunders

UPDATE: President Donald Trump’s hand-picked prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, is in serious jeopardy as her handling of the case against former FBI Director James Comey faces unprecedented scrutiny. In a critical analysis published just hours ago in The New York Times, legal expert and conservative analyst David French describes the situation as a “comedy of errors” that could derail the entire case.

This urgent revelation follows news that Halligan failed to properly present the second indictment to the grand jury, a mistake that could lead to the case being dismissed altogether. French emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, “I never witnessed the level of legal incompetence that we are witnessing from the Trump administration.”

The latest developments highlight a magistrate judge’s concerns about Halligan’s mishandling of attorney-client communications involving Comey and his former lawyer, Daniel Richman, a law professor at Columbia Law School. This violation of fundamental legal principles raises serious questions about the integrity of the prosecution’s case.

Adding to the turmoil, the judge noted whether the Trump FBI adhered to the Fourth Amendment when executing the search warrant related to Richman. Halligan’s missteps have not gone unnoticed by the grand jurors, who challenged her on the evidence against Comey. French pointed out that Halligan’s response included a “fundamental and highly prejudicial misstatement of the law,” suggesting that Comey does not possess a Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

The judge’s remarks indicate a potential crisis for Halligan, as confusion surrounding the grand jury’s review of the second indictment has left the court in “uncharted legal territory.” French warned that Halligan’s procedural errors could prove to be fatal to the case, stating, “If I’d committed that level of malpractice when I was litigating, it would have been instantly fatal to my continued employment.”

As of now, the magistrate judge has not made a decision regarding the dismissal of the case, but the growing list of irregularities raises urgent questions about the future of the prosecution. The implications of these blunders extend beyond courtroom decorum, potentially impacting the legal standing of high-profile figures within the Trump administration.

What’s Next: The legal community is closely monitoring this situation as Halligan’s future hangs in the balance. Observers are left wondering whether these errors will lead to a significant shift in the ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump and his associates.

Stay tuned for live updates as this story develops and the ramifications of these legal missteps unfold.